New Zealand to Charge Foreign Tourists for Access to Iconic Natural Attractions

Starting in 2027, New Zealand will require foreign visitors to pay a fee – ranging from NZ$20 to NZ$40 – at four of its most visited conservation sites, reinvesting the revenue in maintenance, infrastructure, and boosting local communities.

Yuliya Karotkaya By Yuliya Karotkaya Updated 2 mins read
New Zealand to Charge Foreign Tourists for Access to Iconic Natural Attractions
New Zealand plans to charge foreign visitors NZ$20-40 to visit iconic natural landmarks, with funds earmarked for conservation and local infrastructure. Photo: Félix Lam / Unsplash

New Zealand is taking a proactive step to protect its natural heritage by introducing fees for international tourists visiting its most iconic natural sites. From 2027, foreign visitors will pay between NZ$20 and NZ$40 to access four flagship attractions – Cathedral Cove / Te Whanganui-a-Hei, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound, and Aoraki Mount Cook. The new fees are part of a broader strategy to tackle overtourism, support environmental preservation, and promote equitable economic benefit for local communities.

Balancing Tourism and Conservation Through Targeted Fees

The move reflects the government’s commitment to sustainable tourism. Conservation Minister Tama Potaka explained that these locations frequently host up to 80% international visitors – so having them contribute directly to upkeep is only fair. The fund is expected to raise up to NZ$62 million annually, earmarked for trail maintenance, waste management, habitat restoration, and updated visitor infrastructure.

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon echoed the sentiment, noting that charging foreign tourists for these natural treasures helps support ecological stewardship while preserving free access for New Zealand citizens. The initiative also aligns with reforms to the Conservation Act that aim to simplify business concessions in protected areas, enabling more eco-friendly services and infrastructure to flourish without excessive bureaucracy.

However, not everyone is convinced. Environmental groups caution that easing rules for commercial activity may threaten fragile ecosystems. Critics argue that making it easier to permit tourism businesses on conservation land risks prioritizing profit over protection. Public feedback reflects similar tension – while many acknowledge the need for better funding of conservation efforts, there is concern about increasing costs for travelers and potential penalty to local tourism.

Despite mixed reactions, this policy aligns with global tourism models where user fees fund sustainability – similar to Bhutan’s per-night environmental levy or Iceland’s eco-tourism taxes. The approach allows governments to ring-fence revenue specifically for conservation, bypassing general budget constraints. As New Zealand navigates tourism recovery post-pandemic, the targeted fee model represents a thoughtful step toward preserving its natural wonders for future generations.