Air New Zealand to Sell Economy Skynest Sleep Pods From May in a New Push to Improve Ultra-Long-Haul Travel

Spirit Airlines may be approaching its most serious breaking point yet, with reports suggesting the carrier could liquidate as early as this week. That marks a sharp turn for an airline that had only recently indicated it expected to emerge from bankruptcy in the coming months.

Instead, Spirit now appears to be running into the combined force of rising fuel costs, a weak financial position, and a business model that has become far harder to sustain in the current U.S. airline market.

The airline has already been through two bankruptcies in less than a year, an extraordinary level of instability even in a cyclical industry. While management had outlined a plan centered on shrinking operations and focusing on stronger demand periods and more profitable routes, that strategy was always going to be difficult. For a carrier built on ultra-low fares and high aircraft utilization, shrinking can protect cash in the short term, but it also makes it harder to maintain the cost advantages that low-cost airlines rely on.

Why Spirit’s Position Has Become So Fragile

Spirit’s problems did not begin with the latest fuel shock, but higher oil prices may have pushed an already weak company closer to the edge. Fuel is one of the biggest airline expenses after labor, and low-cost carriers like Spirit are especially exposed when costs jump quickly. They generally have fewer high-margin buffers than larger rivals, including premium cabins, large loyalty-program profits, and broad international networks.

That structural weakness has been building for years. After the pandemic, wages and operating expenses climbed, domestic airfare came under pressure from too much capacity, and customer behavior shifted toward airlines that could offer more comfort or more flexibility. Spirit tried to respond by adding bundled fares and roomier seating options to attract higher-spending travelers, but that repositioning did not erase the basic challenge: it remained an airline trying to compete in a brutally price-sensitive segment while facing rising costs and weakened finances.

The company was also hit by a series of setbacks outside its control. Pratt & Whitney engine issues grounded dozens of Airbus aircraft, reducing operational flexibility and putting additional strain on the schedule. On top of that, the proposed JetBlue acquisition was blocked, removing what might have been the clearest path to survival.

What Liquidation Would Mean

If Spirit does liquidate, it would be one of the most significant U.S. airline failures in years. It would mean the disappearance of a carrier that, for all its polarizing reputation, played a major role in keeping fares low in many domestic leisure markets. It would also have immediate consequences for employees, travelers, and competitors.

For passengers, Spirit’s exit would likely reduce low-fare competition on overlapping routes and could eventually put upward pressure on prices in some markets. For rivals, especially airlines competing for similar leisure traffic, the disappearance of Spirit could create room to absorb demand. For the broader industry, it would be another sign that the low-cost model in the United States is under intense strain when it lacks either scale or premium revenue support.

Spirit once stood out for steady profitability and a clear niche. Now it is a case study in how quickly the economics of airline competition can change. If liquidation does happen, it will not be because of one single event. It will be the result of several years of pressure finally converging at once.

Holland America Line is making one of the biggest bets on fleet renewal in its long history, committing more than $500 million to a multiyear modernization of six ships in its Vista and Signature classes. The project, branded Holland America Evolution, is being framed as the largest guest-experience update in the line’s 153-year history and signals a clear decision to reinvest in existing tonnage rather than pursue rapid fleet expansion.

That approach says a great deal about where the brand sees its opportunity. Holland America is not chasing the arms race of bigger ships and louder attractions. Instead, it is doubling down on what has long differentiated the line: ships that feel spacious, calmer, and less crowded than many competitors, while still delivering a premium onboard product.

The company says the renovations will expand onboard choice and bring favored features from its newer Pinnacle-class ships across a broader share of the fleet, but without sacrificing the intimate feel that existing guests value.

The six ships involved are the Vista-class Oosterdam, Zuiderdam, Westerdam, and Noordam, along with the Signature-class Nieuw Amsterdam and Eurodam. These vessels were built between 2002 and 2010, making them old enough to need more than cosmetic touch-ups but still central enough to the fleet that replacing them would be far more expensive than upgrading them.

In practical terms, Holland America is using this project to extend their relevance in a market where travelers increasingly expect newer-style accommodations and venues even on smaller or older ships.

New Cabins, More Choice, and a Stronger Premium Feel

Oosterdam will be the first ship to emerge from the program, returning in fall 2027 with a number of the most visible changes. Among the most notable additions are 30 Solo Verandah staterooms, a direct response to growing demand from solo travelers who want private outdoor space without paying the premium typically attached to larger accommodations. That is a smart move in a cruise market where solo demand has become too significant to ignore.

The ship will also gain two Bridgeview Suites, each around 900 square feet with wraparound balconies and panoramic views, along with a reimagined Pinnacle Suite spanning more than 1,500 square feet. On top of that, Oosterdam will receive 24 Vista Suites, a category previously associated with the line’s newer Pinnacle-class ships. Altogether, 76 new staterooms will be added, increasing capacity while still preserving the generous sense of space Holland America says it wants to protect.

The onboard experience is also being lifted with the addition of the Grand Dutch Café, one of the most successful guest favorites from the Pinnacle-class vessels. That venue has become a recognizable expression of the brand’s Dutch identity, and its expansion across older ships is a logical way to make the fleet feel more consistent.

Why This Matters Beyond One Drydock Project

The significance of Holland America Evolution goes beyond décor or extra suites. It reflects a broader cruise industry reality: fleet renewal no longer always means newbuilds. For some brands, especially those with clear positioning and loyal repeat passengers, the smarter move is targeted reinvestment in ships that already fit the brand well.

Holland America has also tied the project to sustainability, with plans for smarter power management, system improvements, and greater reuse of materials during refurbishment. That may not be the headline feature for most guests, but it matters commercially as operators face increasing pressure to improve efficiency and lower energy demand on older ships.

In the end, this is a disciplined strategy. Holland America is not trying to become a different cruise line. It is trying to make its existing ships feel more complete, more current, and more aligned with how guests want to travel now. In today’s cruise market, that may be the more valuable kind of evolution.

American Airlines has joined the latest wave of U.S. carriers raising checked bag fees, adding another reminder that the cost of flying is continuing to climb even before travelers get to the ticket total. For tickets booked on or after April 9, the airline is charging $50 for a first checked bag and $60 for a second checked bag on domestic flights, as well as flights to Canada and short-haul international destinations. That is a $10 increase on both. A third checked bag purchased at the airport now costs $200.

There is a partial discount for travelers who pay in advance through American’s website or app. In those cases, the first bag costs $45 and the second costs $55. Even so, the broader direction is clear: airlines are looking for more revenue from ancillary fees as operating costs rise, particularly because of higher jet fuel prices. American is following competitors including Delta, United, JetBlue, Southwest, Alaska Airlines, and Hawaiian Airlines, all of which have recently made similar moves.

The fee changes are especially significant for Basic Economy passengers, who are once again being asked to accept a harsher tradeoff in exchange for the lowest fare. For domestic Basic Economy tickets purchased on or after May 18, a first checked bag will cost $55 and a second will cost $65. Travelers who prepay online or in the app can reduce those to $50 and $60. In selected South America markets, some Basic Economy passengers will face even higher baggage costs.

American is also making Basic Economy less flexible in other ways. Starting May 18, all customers on those fares, including elite status members, will have to pay to select a seat. They also will no longer be eligible for complimentary upgrades or systemwide upgrades on Basic Economy tickets. Later this year, non-status AAdvantage members without eligible co-branded cards are also expected to board later, in Group 7. Altogether, these changes widen the gap between Basic Economy and the standard Main Cabin product.

From the airline’s perspective, the strategy is straightforward. Rising fuel and operating costs are squeezing margins, and baggage fees remain one of the fastest ways to recover revenue without raising every published fare by the same amount. But from the traveler’s perspective, the effect is cumulative. A ticket that may still look competitive at first glance becomes notably more expensive once bags, seats, and fare restrictions are added back in.

American has kept some protections in place. AAdvantage status members still receive complimentary bags, many co-branded credit card holders still get a first checked bag free on eligible domestic itineraries, premium-cabin passengers continue to receive free baggage, and active-duty U.S. military personnel still qualify for complimentary bags. Even so, for many ordinary leisure travelers, especially families and occasional flyers, another major carrier has made the total price of a trip harder to keep under control.

American Express Global Business Travel is repositioning Egencia for the next phase of corporate travel technology, adding agentic AI capabilities and tighter expense integration as it tries to reduce friction across the entire trip workflow.

The latest version of Egencia introduces a conversational AI assistant that can help users ask questions, book travel, and manage trips within a single interaction, while also connecting more directly with tools companies already use, including Microsoft Teams and Concur Expense.

The move is significant because Egencia has long been one of the more digitally mature brands in managed business travel. Acquired by Amex GBT from Expedia Group in 2021, it already stood out for a strong self-service model and a corporate user base that books overwhelmingly through digital channels.

Now the focus is shifting from simple digital booking to a broader idea of intelligent orchestration, where travelers, travel managers, and finance teams spend less time switching between systems and more time working inside one connected workflow.

Amex GBT says the upgraded solution is designed to cut average booking time to under three minutes while also automating parts of expense reconciliation. That combination addresses one of the most persistent complaints in business travel: booking may happen in one place, servicing in another, and expenses somewhere else entirely. Egencia’s new positioning suggests that the next competitive battleground is no longer just inventory or content. It is workflow efficiency.

From Self-Service to Conversational Travel Management

At the center of the update is Egencia AI, a conversational assistant that lets travelers search, book, and manage trips in one thread rather than through multiple steps and screens. In practice, that means a traveler could move from asking about flight options to confirming a booking and later changing that itinerary within the same conversation.

Amex GBT is also emphasizing that AI will sit alongside access to a trusted human consultant, which is an important distinction in business travel, where policy, disruption, and duty-of-care concerns make fully automated journeys harder to sell.

This hybrid model reflects a wider pattern in travel technology. Companies are increasingly willing to use AI for speed and convenience, but still want clear paths to accountability when something goes wrong. In corporate travel, that is even more important because the traveler is not just acting as a consumer. They are operating within company policy, approval structures, negotiated rates, and reporting requirements.

Why Expense Integration Matters as Much as AI

The other major update may be less flashy but just as important: Egencia bookings and receipts can now flow into Concur Expense in near real time. That reduces manual line-item entry and helps connect travel and expense into a single process. For finance teams, that means cleaner reporting and fewer reconciliation problems. For travelers, it means less administrative work after the trip.

Egencia’s refreshed interface also points to a broader modernization effort, with simpler search and more intuitive fare displays. These changes matter because adoption in corporate travel depends heavily on usability. Even the smartest AI tool will struggle if employees find it harder to use than consumer platforms.

Taken together, the update shows how Amex GBT wants Egencia to serve as both a product in its own right and a testing ground for the wider business. The company has already said that learnings from Egencia will inform other solutions in its portfolio. That makes this more than a brand refresh. It is a signal of where managed travel is headed: toward faster, more conversational, more integrated systems that treat booking, servicing, and expense as one connected experience.

Expedia Group says travelers are increasingly willing to use AI as a planning tool, but still hesitate when it comes to letting that same technology handle the actual booking. Its new AI Trust Gap report, based on a survey of more than 5,700 adults across the U.S., U.K., and India, points to a clear pattern: AI is gaining traction in travel discovery, but trust still sits firmly with established travel brands when money and accountability enter the picture.

That distinction may be one of the most important travel-tech stories of 2026. For years, the industry has assumed that if AI got good enough at recommendations, it would naturally move deeper into transactions. Expedia’s findings suggest the path is not that simple. Travelers appear open to using AI in a supporting role, especially for time-saving tasks like suggesting destinations, building itineraries, or tracking prices. But once a trip moves from inspiration to payment, they still want the protection, familiarity, and customer service infrastructure of a known booking platform.

The report lays out the contrast clearly. More than half of travelers said they are comfortable with AI suggesting travel options. A meaningful share said they would use it to monitor prices or help shape an itinerary. Nearly half said AI can save time and surface places they may not have otherwise discovered. Yet only a small minority currently rely on AI chatbots or agents for trip planning, and even fewer feel comfortable letting them actually make a purchase. Expedia says 68 percent of travelers still prefer to book with a trusted travel brand over an AI chatbot or agent, while 66 percent say they would not trust AI to buy or book anything on their behalf.

Planning Is One Thing, Payment Is Another

That gap reflects how travelers think about risk. Travel is not a low-stakes purchase. A wrong hotel, a failed booking, a mistimed flight, or a support problem during a disruption can quickly become expensive and stressful. In that context, people are not just asking whether AI can make a booking. They are asking who fixes it if something goes wrong.

Expedia’s data suggests the biggest concerns are loss of control, privacy around data and payment details, and misuse of personal information. There is also concern about what happens after the transaction, particularly if customer service is weak or unclear. In other words, the issue is not purely technological. It is operational and emotional. Travelers want to know there is accountability behind the booking, not just automation.

What This Means for the Travel Industry

The practical takeaway is that travel discovery is fragmenting. People may start their search on AI assistants, search engines, social platforms, or travel sites, but they are still gravitating toward trusted brands when it is time to complete the purchase. That creates a more complicated distribution environment, but also a major opportunity for travel companies that can combine AI-powered inspiration with dependable service and fulfillment.

For Expedia, the message is also strategic. The company is clearly acknowledging that AI alone is not enough to win the booking moment. The real advantage lies in blending AI interfaces with the pricing, supplier relationships, support systems, and operational scale that travelers already trust. The next phase of travel AI may therefore be less about replacing travel brands and more about embedding them wherever trip decisions begin.

If that holds true, the winners will not simply be the companies with the smartest chatbot. They will be the ones that make travelers feel comfortable enough to click book.